Climate 200 is proud to support The Fair Elections Case
The Fair Elections Case

Help fund Zoe & Rex’s High Court Challenge

Australians are voting for independents and minor parties in record numbers - and it’s threatening the major party duopoly. Instead of trying to win voters back with better policies, the major parties have colluded to rig election rules in their favour.

Their new electoral finance laws will make it harder for independent MPs and candidates to compete, leaving you with fewer choices at election time

It’s a direct attack on your voice and your ability to support independent candidates.

Two independent plaintiffs, the former MP for Goldstein Zoe Daniel and former South Australian Senator Rex Patrick, are fighting back, and taking the government all the way to the High Court to get these rules overturned. They’re asking the Court to rule on whether these laws breach Australia’s implied freedom of political communication. But taking a case like this to the High Court isn’t cheap. It requires top-tier legal teams and constitutional barristers.

Every dollar you chip in will go to winning this case, and protecting the integrity of our democracy.

If there are excess funds at the end of this case - either because the Government pays Zoe and Rex’s costs or funds are raised surplus to the final legal costs - then you will be offered a refund. Any remaining amounts will be donated towards further efforts to protect our democracy.

The Fair Elections Case

Here’s why these laws are so undemocratic

A healthy democracy must accommodate newcomers and competition — instead, these new laws will dramatically increase major-party and incumbency advantages and impose disproportionate constraints on new challengers. They’re designed to shut out competitors and prop up the major parties, at a time when Australians are abandoning them in record numbers.

If left unchallenged, these laws will dramatically reduce competition in the political arena, closing it off to new entrants and leaving you with fewer choices at election time.

That’s where you come in. Join the fight today.

Major parties can spend millions more than independents

Independents are strictly capped at  $800k for their entire campaign while a $90m cap for parties allows them to significantly outspend challengers.

A representation of the disparity in funding caps between major parties and other candidates as a timeline infographic for Zoe Daniel and Rex Patrick's Federal High Court Challenge on electoral reforms

Millions more of your taxpayer dollars will go to the major parties

Labor and the Coalition will get an extra $62m in taxpayer funding each electoral cycle.

If these laws had applied to the 2025 election, public funding would have covered 61% of Labor’s $90 million spending cap and 46% of the Liberals’. Independents, by contrast, would have received an average of just 14% of their far smaller $800,000 cap.

An infographic that shows the major parties take tens of millions of dollars in taxpayer funding, while Independents get almost none. Zoe Daniel and Rex Patrick's Federal High Court Challenge on electoral reforms

Fundraising will become much more difficult for independents than multi-branch parties

Major parties, through their federal and state branches, can collect up to $450k per year from a single donor. Independents cannot receive more than $50k per year from a single donor (even crowdfunded donors like Climate 200 and others).

Climate 200 infographic that shows fundraising will become much more difficult for independents than multi-branch parties.

Independents will be crippled, the major parties will barely feel the hit

If these new laws had been in place in the lead up to the 2025 election independents would have lost over $11m in donations. Based on the current available data, the major parties would have lost almost nothing.

Climate 200 infographic that shows if these new laws had been in place in the lead up to the 2025 election, independents would have lost over $11m

here's what the experts are saying about these laws

“The Electoral Reform Act passed by the major parties earlier this year is unfair, undemocratic and fails to serve its stated objectives. It was rushed and may well be unconstitutional.”
Logo: The Australia Institute
“It is an affront to our democratic process that the Electoral Legislation Amendment – significant, complex legislation which concerns the very foundations of our democracy – is proceeding without proper parliamentary process and scrutiny.”
Logo: The Centre for Public Integrity
“The restrictions on our participation in public debate during elections that this bill will impose are a blow to democracy….. The result will be worse policy outcomes, less robust debate, less transparency and accountability for our leaders.”
Logo: Australian Democracy Network